LONDON: Britain should use its military prowess to tackle Islamic State (IS) militants in Iraq, Prime Minister David Cameron said on Sunday, saying they had to be stopped from creating “a terrorist state on the shores of the Mediterranean”.
In his toughest comments yet on IS, an al Qaeda splinter group, Cameron said Britain needed to adopt a more robust stance against Islamic State to prevent it from one day launching an attack on British soil, a warning he first issued in June.
Britain has so far limited its role in Iraq to aid drops, surveillance and agreeing to transport military re-supplies to Kurdish forces. In addition, Britain’s trade envoy to Iraq has said SAS special forces are gathering intelligence there.
“If we do not act to stem the onslaught of this exceptionally dangerous terrorist movement, it will only grow stronger until it can target us on the streets of Britain. We already know that it has the murderous intent,” Cameron wrote in an article for Britain’s Sunday Telegraph newspaper.
As part of its expanded role, he said he wanted Britain to lead diplomatic talks that include regional powers, possibly even Iran, to try to tackle the threat from IS. In recent weeks the group has seized swathes of territory in Syria and Iraq, in a swift and brutal push to the borders of Iraq’s autonomous ethnic Kurdish region and towards Baghdad, sparking the first U.S. air strikes in Iraq since the withdrawal of American troops in 2011.
Cameron said his government should also go further: “True security will only be achieved if we use all our resources – aid, diplomacy, our military prowess,” he wrote.
“We need a firm security response, whether that is military action to go after the terrorists, international co-operation on intelligence and counter-terrorism or uncompromising action against terrorists at home.” Following an agreement with European Union partners last week, he said Britain would supply equipment directly to the Kurdish forces, adding that this could be anything from body armor to specialist counter-explosive equipment.
Cameron precluded a full-scale military intervention in the region however, saying he did not think that “sending armies to fight or occupy” was the right approach. He said he recognized that Britain’s past involvement in conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan had made people wary of over-committing. Cameron has come under pressure at home from some lawmakers and former military commanders to follow the lead of the United States and take tougher action against the militants.
On Sunday, a cleric, Nicholas Baines, the Bishop of Leeds, added his voice to the debate saying the government lacked “a coherent or comprehensive approach to Islamist extremism.”
He complained about what he said was the government’s silence on the fate of tens of thousands of Christians in the Middle East who had been driven from their homes.
The last time Cameron tried to sign Britain up to potential military strikes in the Middle East, against Syria in August 2013, he lost a parliamentary vote. Cameron last week ruled out an immediate recall of parliament, which is in summer recess.
VIENNA: Nuclear talks between Iran and six world powers are making good but slow progress as they ...