Daily Times

Daily Times

Home |  RSS | Archives | Company Financials | Contact Us | Tuesday, November 10, 2009 

Main News
National
Islamabad
Karachi
Lahore
Briefs
Editorial
Business
Real Estate
Sport
Infotainment
Advertise
 
Sunday Magazine
 
External Links
Upperhost.com
Best Web Hosting
Arctic Monkeys Tickets
Remove Personal Antivirus
o2 Arena
Freelance Jobs
Robbie Williams Tickets
Encore Tickets
Get high PR links
 
Google


 
Thursday, July 07, 2005 E-Mail this article to a friend Printer Friendly Version

Share this story!  del.icio.us digg Reddit Furl Fark TailRank Ma.gnolia NewsVine Simpy Spurl 

Africa throws UNSC expansion into a muddle

By Evelyn Leopold

The African Union plan insists on veto power for all new permanent members whereas the G-4 nations dropped their call for a veto after too many objections were raised


THE African Union’s new plan to expand the UN Security Council by 11 members has thrown a proposal by Germany, Brazil, India and Japan into turmoil, diplomats said.

At its just-ended summit in Sirte, Libya on Tuesday, the AU said the 15-member UN council should be expanded to 26 seats, with six new permanent members, two of them from Africa. It also wants six new nonpermanent seats with two for Africa.

The plan is similar to one proposed by four aspirants for permanent seats - Germany, Brazil, India and Japan, known as the Group of Four or G-4.

The G-4 draft resolution, already delayed twice, would add 10 seats for a total of 25, including two new permanent members from Africa. The G4 plan called for one, rather than two, nonpermanent members from Africa nations.

Without Africa’s 53 votes, the G-4 draft resolution will not reach the 128 or two-thirds vote required among the 191 UN General Assembly members.

“This means the G-4 will have to wait,” Algeria UN Ambassador Abdallah Baali said in a telephone interview from Sirte. “The vote they were hoping to get in Africa won’t be there.”

Baali, a current council member, had lobbied for a rival plan, backed by Italy, Canada, South Korea and other nations, which would add 10 nonpermanent seats.

But he said he was now behind the AU proposal because “it was adopted and the highest level and we are all bound by this position.” He said Nigeria and Ghana headed a committee of 15 that would talk to General Assembly members.

Secretary-General Kofi Annan wants a decision by the time a UN world summit takes place in September, arguing that the make-up of the council, weighted toward industrial nations, reflects the world of 1945.

Currently, the council has 15 members, five veto-wielding states - the United States, France, Britain, Russia and China - and 10 nonpermanent seats, including three for Africa, which rotate for two-year terms.

The African Union plan also insists on veto power for all new permanent members whereas the G-4 nations dropped their call for a veto after too many objections were raised. Instead, they asked for a decision on the veto in 15 years.

Germany, India, Brazil and Japan, after postponing their resolution from June until July, now have to consider whether to call for a vote this month.

One G-4 member, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the African Union position was so close to their own, they could only gain votes. He said the African Union also killed off rival proposals, such as no new permanent members.

Another problem is that the AU was unable to decide on which countries to fill the seats, with South Africa, Nigeria and Egypt the main candidates. Libya, Kenya and Senegal also have bid for the seats but it is unlikely they would be endorsed by the General Assembly.

The first step, however, is to get a framework resolution through the General Assembly by a two-thirds vote, without mentioning names of candidates. The second step would be to fill candidates for permanent seats.

The last step is to change the UN Charter, over which national legislatures of the current five permanent council members have veto power.

Among the five council powers, Britain and France support the Group of Four proposal while the United States, Russia and China have argued against a solution at this time. reuters

Home | Foreign


Share this story!  del.icio.us digg Reddit Furl Fark TailRank Ma.gnolia NewsVine Simpy Spurl 
EU lawmaker calls for UN force in Iraq
US redefines terrorism: Estimate shows 3,192 terror attacks in 2004
Pentagon expands military role in domestic security
US says African corruption fight vital for aid
Nobel laureate says debt relief no panacea for Africa
Prisoners well-treated at Guantanamo: Bush
Israel to ask US to fund Gaza pullout
UN Security Council delays Sudan sanctions by three months
Annan says G-8 summit is ‘make or break’ moment for world’s poor
Seoul sees six-party talks resuming this month
Election official says he did not collude with Arroyo
Wrongly detained woman to sue Australian govt over treatment
Africa throws UNSC expansion into a muddle
Blood-stained hands: Afghan officials implicated in war crimes, says HRW
‘Ayodhya attack aimed at inflaming communal riots in India’
HRW calls on India to prevent sectarianism
Indian PM leaves for G-8 Summit
US media group face charges in Uzbekistan
Nuclear time-bomb ticks on Central Asian valley’s edge
United States sees more violence in Afghanistan
Myanmar frees 249 political prisoners
Ayodhya attack a conspiracy, says Vajpayee
Sri Lankan aid-sharing deal stirs political turmoil
 
Daily Times - All Rights Reserved
Site developed and hosted by WorldCALL Internet Solutions