Daily Times

Home | Archives | Company Financials | Contact Us |  Subscribe | Wednesday, May 22, 2013 

Main News
National
Islamabad
Karachi
Lahore
Briefs
Foreign
Editorial
Business
Sport
Entertainment
Advertise
 
Sunday Magazine
 
Boss
 
Wikkid
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Used
Web
 


 
Saturday, May 03, 2003 E-Mail this article to a friend Printer Friendly Version
Share | |

Britain reined in US military’s shock and awe strategy

By David Charter and Michael Evans

LONDON: Britain played a defining role in blocking an American plan to open the Iraq war with up to six days of shock and awe air strikes on Baghdad, The Times has learnt.

American commanders halved the planned bombing campaign after Air Marshal Brian Burridge, the commander of British Forces in the Gulf, argued that it would have disastrous political consequences.

The disclosure explains one of the great mysteries of the campaign: America’s failure to use its massive arsenal in an overwhelming attack to force immediate Iraqi capitulation. Defence sources said that Air Marshal Burridge was involved in a hotly contested debate over the airstrikes and their targets which lasted right until the first shots were fired.

British lawyers and military advisers adopted a “tighter” interpretation than Washington over what was a legitimate target, and some of those chosen by the Americans were removed from the list because of British objections. Air Marshal Burridge retained his national “red card” for every airstrike launched.

The dispute had broadened after Air Marshal Burridge, backed by London, told the coalition commander General Tommy Franks that he was totally against the shock and awe concept, believing that it would strengthen rather than destroy Iraqi resolve. In the end he was never forced explicitly to threaten to withdraw British military support because he was able to talk through his differences with General Franks.

“None of us ever approved of the phrase Shock and Awe because it painted totally the wrong picture, but it was the Pentagon’s favourite slogan,” one British source said.

The shock and awe tactic was championed by Lieutenant-General Michael Moseley, the US Air Force commander in the Gulf who argued that it alone could bring down Saddam Hussein’s regime, removing the necessity for a dangerous ground offensive which might face weapons of mass destruction. “We’ll never know whether shock and awe would have shortened the war,” one source said. —LT

Home | Foreign

Share | |
Britain reined in US military’s shock and awe strategy
Final tests find no nerve agents in Iraqi chemical
Bush post-war standing is strong, but weaker than his dad’s
‘Columbia was doomed once it began re-entry’
Israel cracking down on foreign peace activists
Hoon at odds with Straw over weapons
US to send military material from Iraq to Colombia
North Korean regime accused of trafficking heroin to Australia
China’s role in Korean nuclear talks motivated by self-interest
Foreign Views: Undermining NATO can hurt trans-atlantic alliance
Putin: the incredibly shrinking president
Dealing with former Baathist officials
India’s opportunity in Iraq
A time to push for comprehensive settlement in Palestine
Region: Japan seeks ally in India for campaign against North Korea
US State Dept workers charged in visa scheme in Sri Lanka
India to launch satellite on 8th
World Bank seeks push in Lanka peace process
Security remains major concern for Afghanistan
Taka float plan may trigger new slide
B’desh dangerous place for journalists
Air India pilots call off strike
Korean students climb Hunchi peak
Iran posing another nuclear dilemma for US
 
Daily Times - All Rights Reserved
Site developed and hosted by WorldCALL Internet Solutions


Used books in Pakistan   Web hosting in Pakistan