Daily Times

Daily Times

Home |  RSS | Archives | Company Financials | Contact Us | Monday, December 31, 2007 

Main News
National
Islamabad
Karachi
Lahore
Briefs
Foreign
Editorial
Info Tech
Real Estate
Sport
Infotainment
Advertise
 
Sunday Magazine
 
External Links
Upperhost.com
Best Web Hosting
Remove Security Tool
Jobs in Pakistan
Florence and the Machine Tickets
 
Google


 
Friday, February 11, 2005 E-Mail this article to a friend Printer Friendly Version

Share this story!  del.icio.us digg Reddit Furl Fark TailRank Ma.gnolia NewsVine Simpy Spurl 

Experts doubt United States intelligence on Tehran

* Influential neo-conservatives say CIA’s entire network in Iran suffered a major setback
* The CIA has yet to give policymakers an up-to-date assessment on Tehran


WASHINGTON: US intelligence is unlikely to know much about Iran’s contentious nuclear programme and could be vulnerable to manipulation for political ends, former intelligence officers and other experts say.

Amid an escalating war of words between Washington and Tehran, the experts say they doubt the CIA has been able to recruit agents with access to the small circle of clerics who control the Islamic Republic’s national security policy.

Serious doubts also surround the effectiveness of an expanded intelligence role for the Pentagon, which former intelligence officials say is preparing covert military forays to look for evidence near suspected weapons facilities.

“I will be highly remarkably surprised if the United States has (intelligence) assets in the organs of power,” said Ray Takeyh, an Iran expert at the Council on Foreign Relations.

“They don’t even know who the second-tier Revolutionary Guards are,” he added. Doubts about US intelligence on Iran have arisen amid talk of possible military strikes by the United States or Israel against suspected nuclear weapons facilities.

Former chief weapons inspector David Kay, the first to declare US intelligence on weapons of mass destruction in Iraq a failure, warned that the Bush administration is again relying on evidence from dissidents, as it did in pre-war Iraq.

“The tendency is to force the intelligence to support the political argument,” Kay said in a CNN interview on Wednesday. He added that the CIA has yet to give US policymakers an up-to-date comprehensive intelligence assessment on Iran.

National intelligence estimate: “We’re talking about military action against Iran and we don’t have a national intelligence estimate that shows what we do know, what we don’t know and the basis for what we think we know,” Kay said.

Problems arose for US intelligence in Iran a quarter of a century ago after the Islamic revolution, when Washington cut diplomatic ties following the seizure of the American embassy by student radicals.

Richard Perle, the influential neo-conservative thinker who was a driving force behind the US-led invasion of Iraq, said intelligence suffered a major setback in Iran with the arrest of about 40 agents in the mid-1990s.

“As I understand it, virtually our entire network in Iran was wiped out,” Perle recently told the House of Representatives intelligence committee.

“I think we’re in very bad shape in Iran,” he said. Some intelligence analysts argue a pre-emptive strike is the only way to delay Iranian nuclear-weapons production, despite the Bush administration’s public emphasis on diplomacy.

Tehran denies US charges that it is seeking nuclear weapons and has warned that a US or Israeli strike would only accelerate its legal uranium enrichment activities. US intelligence has had a huge credibility problem over reports that pre-war Iraq possessed large stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons and was pursuing nuclear arms.

The assertions were a main justification for the 2003 US invasion, but no such weapons have been found.

“If US intelligence was bad in Iraq, and it was atrocious, it’s probably going to be worse vis-à-vis Iran,” said Richard Russell, a former CIA analyst who teaches at the National Defence University. The task of recruiting useful agents in Iran faces immense hurdles posed by a secretive decision-making hierarchy and widespread mistrust of the US government, experts said.

“People have worked their whole lives on the ‘Iran problem’ and they’ll finish their lives with a huge ‘A’ for effort and probably a ‘C’ in terms of recruited human sources,” said a former senior intelligence official who asked not to be named.

Not even covert forays into Iran by US military units would likely bear much fruit, the former official added.

“They’re never going to find anything out of substance except that there’s some mysterious place in the desert with barbed wire and mines around it,” he said. reuters

Home | Foreign


Share this story!  del.icio.us digg Reddit Furl Fark TailRank Ma.gnolia NewsVine Simpy Spurl 
US N-strategy calls for outsourcing strikes
‘US aviation received pre-9/11 warning of Al Qaeda plans’
Kofi Annan insists UN role vital for world affairs
Diplomats say US lobbying to oust ElBaradei
US hints at sanctions against Syria
Pentagon confirms Guantanamo sex tactics
Sharon admits importance of prisoner release
American group to monitor UN work
Secretive Saudi Arabia opens up to tell its story
Australian militant allegedly had meetings with Bin Laden
Israeli businessman kidnapped in Russia
Poll says Hillary Clinton most popular Democrat
Putin asks UN for new standards on human rights
US senator introduces bill to shield journalists
US issues stamp to commemorate former president Reagan
R E G I O N: US faces dilemma in Nepal after king’s power grab
Nepal’s Maoists launch first major offensive
Experts doubt United States intelligence on Tehran
Iran marks 26th anniversary of Islamic Revolution
UN seeks Tamil Tigers travel ban
Indian PM seeks labour reforms
Berlin bans rallies for change in Iran
India welcomes Israeli-Palestinian truce deal
Sri Lankan rebels want answers
Isolation and pride could see Panjsher left behind
 
Daily Times - All Rights Reserved
Site developed and hosted by WorldCALL Internet Solutions