Daily Times

Home | Archives | Company Financials | Contact Us |  Subscribe | Sunday, May 26, 2013 

Main News
National
Islamabad
Karachi
Lahore
Briefs
Foreign
Editorial
Business
Sport
Entertainment
Advertise
 
Sunday Magazine
 
Boss
 
Wikkid
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Used
Web
 


 
Sunday, November 10, 2002 E-Mail this article to a friend Printer Friendly Version
Share | |

Waverer voted yes ‘to stop use of force and US right to go to war’

By Robert Fisk

Until the very last moment, it was expected that Syria would abstain from voting at the UN. Damascus has, for at least two years, publicly condemned the UN sanctions against Iraq which have cost the lives of half a million children, according to former UN officials

Syria’s minister of information, a senior member of the Baath party, told The Independent last night that his country voted for the resolution on Iraq’s arms inspection in order “to eliminate the [US] right to go to war against Iraq.” Adnan Omran, formerly Syria’s ambassador to London, said the resolution prevented the use of force by the United States and “guaranteed” the central role of the UN. Mr Omran said Syria had been assured by other members of the Security Council that the resolution did not give the US government the right to invade Iraq.

“We did not accept that the resolution permitted the US and Britain to go to war against Iraq,” he said. The Syrian government, Mr Omran said, accepts the “central role of the UN Security Council” in the crisis.

Until the very last moment, it was expected that Syria would abstain from voting at the UN. Damascus has, for at least two years, publicly condemned the UN sanctions against Iraq which have cost the lives of half a million children, according to former UN officials. Damascus and Baghdad have been renewing relations since 2000; even rail links between the two capitals have now been restored through Turkey. Much more serious for Syria, however, is the evidence that the US – or at least that part of the administration which supports Israel – is building a case to put Damascus on the “terrorist” list because of its support for the Lebanese Hizbollah in its war against Israel.

For many weeks, American newspapers have been claiming that the Hizbollah has new long-range missiles that could target Israeli cities – which appears to be untrue – and that the movement was behind the killing of 241 US military personnel at the American marine base in Beirut in 1993. For the Syrians, the real question will be: if the US invades Iraq, who will be next? Iran? Or Syria? —The Independent

Home | Foreign

Share | |
IRAQ SPECIAL: Bush team used 3-point plan for UN support on Iraq
Countdown begins for Saddam
Waverer voted yes ‘to stop use of force and US right to go to war’
Photo released by the US military
Stringent new terms designed to trap Saddam
This can quickly go wrong for Mr Bush
VIEWS: Yemen strike was not an assassination
Egyptian schoolboys study tolerant Islam at Al-Azhar
Northern Tajikistan
No reply to ‘road map’ till Likud vote
Stop heinous acts by Russians and Chechens
FOREIGN NEWS: Fear of terrorist attacks hits peak
US ready to hit Iraq
No evidence of Qaeda link to Bali suspect
Waiting for news for sister's release
Terror groups in Southeast Asia not in one central network
Sheikh who defies Bin Laden’s thugs
REGION: AC-130 mistakenly killed US soldier, two Afghans
China not a threat to India, says Fernandes
SK Prime Minister with Khalida Zia
Congress not to dislodge UP government: Sonia
US blasts death sentence to Iranian reformer
India, China competitors: defines PM
‘US intervened in Afghan clash’
Troop withdrawal gains momentum
 
Daily Times - All Rights Reserved
Site developed and hosted by WorldCALL Internet Solutions


Used books in Pakistan   Web hosting in Pakistan